Agentic Coding with LLMs: Entering the Developer's Matrix

In the ever-evolving landscape of software development, we stand at the precipice of a new era - one where developers and AI collaborate in ways that were once the realm of science fiction. This is the story of my journey through the agentic coding revolution, from early experiments with local models to the sophisticated workflows enabled by tools like Windsurf.

The Red Pill of Development

Remember that pivotal moment in The Matrix when Neo chooses the red pill? That's exactly how I felt when I first began experimenting with LLMs in my development workflow. My journey started with simple projects to test the capabilities of various models, including Claude Sonet, Mistral, and GPT.

As CTO, I've had to balance innovation with risk management. Agentic coding has proven invaluable in this regard, allowing me to:

• Rapidly prototype new features
• Maintain compliance with DSGVO
• Optimize development workflows
• Ensure code quality across projects

My First Steps in the Code Matrix

My initial experiments focused on theme development for Ghost CMS, integrating a 3D viewer based on pmndrs repos using Three.js. This project became my testing ground for understanding the strengths and limitations of different LLMs.

Navigating the Developer's Matrix

1. Model Exploration

Testing and comparing different LLMs in 2024/2025 reveals distinct characteristics and capabilities:

• Claude Sonet (Anthropic): Known for its stability and advanced reasoning capabilities, though it remains one of the more expensive options. Recent updates have improved its code completion accuracy by 15%.
• Deepseek (CN): The R1 and V3 models continue to be popular choices for their speed and reliability. The latest version (V3.2) offers improved edit_tool integration and better context handling.
• GPT-4o (OpenAI): The latest iteration offers faster response times and better code understanding, though it remains costly. Its new 'Code Interpreter' feature provides real-time debugging suggestions.
• Llama 3.3 (Meta): A powerhouse for developers, offering excellent code explanation and debugging support. Its open-source nature makes it a favorite for customization.
• Mistral 2.0 (FRA/EU): Known for its exceptional code completion and local deployment capabilities. The latest version supports larger context windows (up to 128k tokens).
• Gemini Pro (Google): Offers strong integration with Google's developer tools and cloud services. Its 'Code Assistant' feature provides real-time suggestions and error detection.

Recent benchmarks show that while all models have improved in code generation accuracy, the choice depends on specific needs:

• For rapid prototyping: GPT-4o and Llama 3.3 lead
• For cost-effectiveness: Deepseek V3 and Mistral 2.0 are top choices
• For enterprise-grade security: Claude Sonet remains the gold standard
• For open-source flexibility: Llama 3.3 and Mistral 2.0 are ideal

Understanding these characteristics helps in selecting the right tool for specific development tasks, whether it's rapid prototyping, debugging, or maintaining legacy code.

2. Local Development

Local models with Ollama showed promise but struggled with context length. While consistency in continuing previous work was surprisingly good, managing and updating local LLMs proved time-consuming.

3. Comparative Analysis

Deepseek and it's newest reasoning models revolutionized my approach to comparative work, especially with tools like Cline an Windsurf. The ability to follow chains of thought became particularly valuable when working with large preexisting codebases. Understanding what drives the decision to approach any input given to the LLM is crucial and beneficial for the development.

4. Workflow Integration

My workflow has evolved to focus on efficiency and precision. Whether I'm reviewing merge requests, untangling legacy code, or polishing UI elements, my tools adapt to the task at hand.

For example, modernizing the Ghost CMS theme felt like having a time machine that understood both the past and present of our codebase. Similarly, implementing a complex feature for my website was seamless - from initial commit to final approval, the context awareness kept me focused. Also it gave me enough hope to move on and improve my agentic coding workflow.

The key is flexibility. Tools should enhance creativity, not constrain it - letting me focus on the art of development. It is about crafting a valuable result.

The Evolution of Agentic Coding

The landscape of agentic coding has evolved dramatically since my initial experiments. Today, I primarily use Windsurf, whose diff-based and flow-based approach has proven superior to the Cursor methodology. A key differentiator is Windsurf's implementation of Deepseek, which Cursor lacks. This evolution mirrors Neo's progression in The Matrix - from discovering the digital world to mastering it. Obviously I'm just following my initial matrix analogy but this is actually how I felt.

Windsurf vs. Cursor

• Analytical: Cascade provides detailed info about what and how it examines the preexisting code base.
• Flow-based workflow: Enables more natural development progression
• Diff-based approach: Provides clearer tracking of changes and iterations
• Integration: Seamlessly combines with existing development tools
• Performance: More efficient handling of complex projects
• Deepseek implementation: Windsurf's integration provides superior reasoning capabilities

Privacy in the Code Matrix

One crucial consideration in agentic coding is data privacy. When working with hosted LLMs, your data resides on the provider's servers, potentially exposing sensitive information. Codeium's SOC2 Type 2 compliance addresses these concerns through:

• Data Encryption : All data is encrypted in transit and at rest
• Access Controls : Strict policies govern who can access your code
• Regular Audits : Independent verification of security practices
• Incident Response : Proven processes for handling potential breaches

This compliance gives me confidence when handling sensitive projects, knowing my code is protected by enterprise-grade security measures.

The Future of Developer-AI Collaboration

As we move forward, I believe agentic coding will become our new reality, much like the Matrix. However, it's crucial to remember that these tools are assistants, not replacements. The human touch in software development - the creativity, the problem-solving, the vision - remains our red pill.

Pro Tips for Navigating the Code Matrix

1. Start with clear, specific goals for your experiments
2. Document your findings systematically
3. Use comparative tools to measure performance
4. Combine multiple models for best results
5. Always maintain human oversight
6. Get your hands dirty - avoid overhyped tutorials
7. Track your time to measure real productivity gains
8. Prioritize privacy and compliance from the start
9. Choose tools that align with your development philosophy
10. Continuously evaluate and adapt your workflow

The Matrix Question: How deep would you actually dive in? Many YouTubers present a polished, overhyped perspective that makes the transition seem effortless. In reality, agentic coding today is awesome but was challenging when I started. There was a glimpse into the future amidst the hype. My advice? Dive into the rabbit holes, but manage your time wisely.

Ingmar Konnow

About Me | X